What is the action taken when a member questions the ruling of the chair?

When a member questions the ruling of the chair, the action taken is to appeal the ruling. This process allows members to challenge decisions made by the chair or presiding officer, facilitating a form of checks and balances within the meeting or assembly.

An appeal typically arises when a member believes that the chair has made an error in judgment or misapplied the rules. By appealing, members can call for a discussion and a vote on whether to uphold or overturn the chair's ruling. This ensures that all members have a say in the decision-making process and that the rules are followed appropriately.

In contrast, amending refers to altering a motion that is currently being discussed; debating involves discussing the merits or issues surrounding a motion; while adopting means agreeing to a motion or proposal that has been put forward. These actions serve different purposes and do not directly address the situation of questioning the chair's ruling.